Members of the Houston Snowmobile Club keep up some 250 km of trails based primarily on forestry roads.

B.C. floats new plan for resource roads

Industry and recreation groups are voicing concerns about a provincial proposal to change how it manages forestry and other resource roads.

Industry and recreation groups are voicing concerns about how B.C. plans to manage forestry and other resource roads.

More than 450,000 km of gravel resource roads crisscross the province, opening up Crown land to loggers, miners, BC Hydro and others. The same roads provide access routes to some remote First Nations and to the backcountry areas that B.C. hunters, hikers and other recreation groups like to get out and enjoy.

Currently, B.C. has 11 different laws and several agencies to manage its resource roads—a costly and sometimes confusing system that the B.C. Liberal government has promised to simplify with a new Natural Resource Roads Act.

Nechako-Lakes MLA John Rustad says the B.C. Liberals withdrew a similar bill in 2008.

“We didn’t really provide a lot of opportunity for input,” said Rustad.

This time, he said the province is doing more consulting. B.C.’s natural resources ministry posted a 40-page discussion paper about the new bill in October and gave stakeholders until Dec. 15 to comment.

Rustad said another flaw in the 2008 bill was that it seemed to shift too many insurance costs onto industry.

“There was a general belief that it had actually become a disincentive to do things on the land base,” he said, explaining that anyone who manages a resource road has to buy liability insurance in case a road washes out or triggers a slide that causes environmental damage.

Liability is still the number-one challenge, said Rustad.

“Companies are interested in getting it off their books as quickly as possible,” he said, but that could mean deactivating roads that other resource companies and recreation groups want to use.

In such cases, Rustad said the question is who takes over.

“Who then takes on the liability?” he asked. “Who takes on maintenance costs of going out to the culverts and checking that everything’s okay?”

According to Doug Routledge, vice president of the Council of Forest Industries, in many cases the province is still the best candidate to manage the roads.

“The nature of their use has changed dramatically in the last ten years or so,” Routledge explained.

Whereas most of B.C.’s resource roads were previously used by a single forestry company, Routledge said it’s now common to see multiple users.

New traffic is coming from oil and gas companies in northeast B.C., he said, and a growing number of recreational users.

“Those roads are much more like a public highway,” he said.

In places like Tatla Lakes, he said forestry roads have also opened up two-wheel drive travel to remote First Nations.

“That’s a new and increasing amount of road use,” Routledge said, “I think there’s a role there for the provincial government to play.”

Routledge said if the province wants to keep an open-road policy, one thing it could do is set up a standard contract for cost-sharing.

“If we want to go fishing on the river or something like that, I don’t think we want to stop and put our twonie into a user box each and every time,” he said. Instead, he said, taxpayers could help keep roads open by having the province pay some 10 or 15 per cent of the costs.

Speaking for the Houston Snowmobile Club, Les Auston agrees that the B.C. government should continue to manage most resource roads.

Based on the province’s discussion paper, the club has already said it cannot support the new roads bill.

“When you read through it all two or three times, basically they’re trying to get out of maintaining those roads,” said Auston. That’s understandable, he added, except that there’s now a big push for more tourism on those roads.

Houston’s snowmobile club looks after some 250 km of trails, mostly on former or active forestry roads.

Auston said the club carries a $10-million insurance policy for the trails, receives another $2 million coverage from the province for maintaining them and has a good relationship with local forestry companies.

Although the discussion paper says resource roads will only be deactivated for environmental or safety reasons, Auston said the club is not so sure that government won’t deactivate roads as a control measure to keep people out of an area.

“That’s always been a concern of ours, and it’s a valid concern today,” he said.

Eckard Mendel, who represents northern B.C. hunters and handles access policy for the BC Wildlife Federation, echoed Auston’s concerns.

“The government, as far as I’m concerned, hasn’t proven that there’s a big issue with liability on roads left to get old on their own,” Mendel said.

“We don’t want to see roads de-activated so that people can’t access Crown land. We think the public has a right because the public in fact owns those roads.”

A finished version of the Natural Resources Road Act is expected by the fall of 2012, and will likely come into effect in 2013.

For more about the proposal, see the project website at www.for.gov.bc.ca/mof/nrra/.

More than 450,000 km of gravel resource roads crisscross the province, opening up Crown land to loggers, miners, BC Hydro and others. The same roads provide access routes to some remote First Nations and to the backcountry areas that B.C. hunters, hikers and other recreation groups like to get out and enjoy.

Currently, B.C. has 11 different laws and several agencies to manage its resource roads—a costly and sometimes confusing system that the B.C. Liberal government has promised to simplify with a new Natural Resource Roads Act.

Nechako-Lakes MLA John Rustad says the B.C. Liberals withdrew a similar bill in 2008.

“We didn’t really provide a lot of opportunity for input,” said Rustad.

This time, he said the province is doing more consulting. B.C.’s natural resources ministry posted a 40-page discussion paper about the new bill in October and gave stakeholders until Dec. 15 to comment.

Rustad said another flaw in the 2008 bill was that it seemed to shift too many insurance costs onto industry.

“There was a general belief that it had actually become a disincentive to do things on the land base,” he said, explaining that anyone who manages a resource road has to buy liability insurance in case a road washes out or triggers a slide that causes environmental damage.

Liability is still the number-one challenge, said Rustad.

“Companies are interested in getting it off their books as quickly as possible,” he said, but that could mean deactivating roads that other resource companies and recreation groups want to use.

In such cases, Rustad said the question is who takes over.

“Who then takes on the liability?” he asked. “Who takes on maintenance costs of going out to the culverts and checking that everything’s okay?”

According to Doug Routledge, vice president of the Council of Forest Industries, in many cases the province is still the best candidate to manage the roads.

“The nature of their use has changed dramatically in the last ten years or so,” Routledge explained.

Whereas most of B.C.’s resource roads were previously used by a single forestry company, Routledge said it’s now common to see multiple users.

New traffic is coming from oil and gas companies in northeast B.C., he said, and a growing number of recreational users.

“Those roads are much more like a public highway,” he said.

In places like Tatla Lakes, he said forestry roads have also opened up two-wheel drive travel to remote First Nations.

“That’s a new and increasing amount of road use,” Routledge said, “I think there’s a role there for the provincial government to play.”

Routledge said if the province wants to keep an open-road policy, one thing it could do is set up a standard contract for cost-sharing.

“If we want to go fishing on the river or something like that, I don’t think we want to stop and put our twonie into a user box each and every time,” he said. Instead, he said, taxpayers could help keep roads open by having the province pay some 10 or 15 per cent of the costs.

Speaking for the Houston Snowmobile Club, Les Auston agrees that the B.C. government should continue to manage most resource roads.

Based on the province’s discussion paper, the club has already said it cannot support the new roads bill.

“When you read through it all two or three times, basically they’re trying to get out of maintaining those roads,” said Auston. That’s understandable, he added, except that there’s now a big push for more tourism on those roads.

Houston’s snowmobile club looks after some 250 km of trails, mostly on former or active forestry roads.

Auston said the club carries a $10-million insurance policy for the trails, receives another $2 million coverage from the province for maintaining them and has a good relationship with local forestry companies.

Although the discussion paper says resource roads will only be deactivated for environmental or safety reasons, Auston said the club is not so sure that government won’t deactivate roads as a control measure to keep people out of an area.

“That’s always been a concern of ours, and it’s a valid concern today,” he said.

Eckard Mendel, who represents northern B.C. hunters and handles access policy for the BC Wildlife Federation, echoed Auston’s concerns.

“The government, as far as I’m concerned, hasn’t proven that there’s a big issue with liability on roads left to get old on their own,” Mendel said.

“We don’t want to see roads de-activated so that people can’t access Crown land. We think the public has a right because the public in fact owns those roads.”

A finished version of the Natural Resources Road Act is expected by the fall of 2012, and will likely come into effect in 2013.

For more about the proposal, see the project website at www.for.gov.bc.ca/mof/nrra/.

 

Just Posted

Province announces $100-million grant funding for Northwest communities

The Northern Capital and Planning Grant will go to four regional districts and 22 municipalities

Prince Rupert Gas Transmission project searches for partners

TransCanada is renewing permits for its natural gas pipeline project to North Coast.

Coastal GasLink stops work to investigate archaeological find

OGC archaeologists are en route to the Houston-area site where Unist’ot’en report finding stone tools

All Native Basketball Tournament Day 5: Recap

Highlights and results from day 5 at the All Native Tournament

All Native Basketball Tournament Day 6: Preview

Look ahead to all the action scheduled for Feb. 16 at the All Native Tournament

B.C. students win Great Waters Challenge video contest

Video, mural and song about saving the salmon claims the top prize

PR firm suspends contract with former B.C. premier amid groping accusation

Edelman says in a statement that Campbell has served as a special adviser to the firm since last July

James says B.C. budget puts priorities on NDP’s poverty, environment plans

She said she expected the government’s poverty reduction and climate change strategies to be priorities in the budget

PHOTOS: Day 1 of the 2019 Canada Winter Games in Red Deer

Games kicked off in Red Deer this week

Ammonia leak shuts down curling club in Nelson

It’s not yet clear when the leak was detected

Pavelski’s 31st goal helps Sharks top Canucks 3-2

Vancouver one point out of second NHL wild-card spot

Eight cases of measles confirmed in Vancouver outbreak

Coastal Health official say the cases stem from the French-language Ecole Jules Verne Secondary

Ontario police field complaints over Amber Alert for missing girl, 11, found dead

Some said the Amber Alert issued late Thursday for Riya Rajkumar disrupted their sleep

Former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell accused of sexual touching

Accuser went to police, interviewed by Britian’s Daily Telegraph

Most Read